# citAEOtion vs Profound: Log-Based AI Tracking vs Prompt Sampling

https://citaeotion.ai/citaeotion-vs-profound/

citAEOtion measures real AI crawler hits in your server traffic for $34.99/mo; Profound samples AI answers for brand mentions starting at around $99/mo billed yearly.
citAEOtion vs Profound comes down to measured versus sampled. citAEOtion is log-based: it reads real server traffic and counts actual AI crawler hits from GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot at $34.99 per month. Profound is prompt-based: it asks AI models sample questions and tracks brand mentions, starting at around $99 per month billed yearly. citAEOtion counts crawler visits; Profound estimates answer share.
Quick answer: citAEOtion and Profound both track AI visibility, but they measure different things. Profound is a prompt-based tracker: it runs sample questions against ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews and reports how often your brand is mentioned, priced at around $99 per month billed yearly for Starter and around $399 per month for Growth. citAEOtion is log-based: it installs a lightweight collector on WordPress, reads real server requests, and reports which AI crawler fetched which URL, when, how often, with what HTTP status, and in which category (AI Training, AI Search, AI Assistant, Data Scraper), for $34.99 per month. Profound estimates mentions from a sample; citAEOtion counts crawler visits from your own traffic. citAEOtion is roughly one third the entry price and adds white-label reports plus a Founders Club that locks 25 percent off agency plans.
The core difference: sampled answers vs counted requests
Profound is built around prompt sampling. It sends a list of questions to AI models and records whether your brand appears in the generated answers. That produces a share-of-voice figure, but it is an estimate: the result depends on which prompts were chosen, which region and model version ran, and the natural variance of non-deterministic models. Two runs of the same prompt set can disagree.
citAEOtion is built around your server traffic. AI systems have to fetch a page before they can summarize or cite it, and every fetch is a real, named request. citAEOtion reads those requests and reports them as fact. You are not looking at a poll of what a model said; you are looking at a census of what AI crawlers did on your site. OpenAI documents how its own crawler identifies itself in exactly this traffic in the OpenAI bots documentation.
citAEOtion vs Profound at a glance

citAEOtion
Profound

Data source
Real server traffic, actual crawler hits
Sampled AI answers to prompts

Method
Census, deterministic
Sampling, non-deterministic

Shows which bots crawled you
Yes, by name and category
No

Catches Amazonbot, Bytespider, scrapers
Yes
No

Starting price
$34.99/mo
around $99/mo (billed yearly)

Growth tier
Multi-site and agency plans
around $399/mo

White-label reports
Yes
Enterprise and custom

Platform
WordPress collector
Web app

What Profound does well
Profound is a strong prompt-based product. The dashboards are clean, it covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, and it reports sentiment, citations, and competitor mention share. For a large brand whose only reporting requirement is answer-level share of voice, and whose budget absorbs around $99 to $399 per month, it does that job well. The limitation is method, not polish: the headline metric is sampled, and it never tells you whether an AI system actually crawled your pages.
What citAEOtion does that Profound cannot
Because citAEOtion reads real traffic, it answers questions a prompt tool structurally cannot. Which AI crawlers reached your site this week? Which pages did GPTBot fetch and which did it skip? Did ClaudeBot ever touch your pricing page? What share of AI requests returned a 404 or a redirect? Which scrapers, like Bytespider or Amazonbot, are pulling your content without ever appearing in a prompt tool's test set? These are facts from your own server, available at $34.99 per month. Walk through the data model on the how it works page.
This matters because citation is a chain: crawl first, then quote. Profound only watches the second step, through a sample. citAEOtion measures the first step exactly, so when you are invisible in AI answers you can see whether the cause is a crawl gap rather than guessing at prompt results.
Price and agency fit
Profound starts at around $99 per month billed yearly and rises to around $399 for Growth. citAEOtion is $34.99 per month for a single site, with multi-site and agency plans and up to 29 percent off annual billing. For agencies the gap widens: citAEOtion ships white-label reports and agency plans, and the Founders Club locks 25 percent off agency pricing forever for a limited number of seats. You can hand a client a report showing exactly which AI systems crawled their site, backed by real numbers, at a fraction of Profound's cost. Profound is not the only tool worth a look: see the broader list of Profound alternatives, or compare another prompt-based option in citAEOtion vs Peec AI.
Which should you choose?
Choose Profound if you are a large brand that needs answer-level mention share and has budget for a sampling tool. Choose citAEOtion if you want to know, as fact, which AI crawlers reach your pages and which ignore them, for $34.99 per month. Many teams run citAEOtion as the always-on ground truth and treat prompt sampling as an optional extra, because a page no AI bot fetches cannot be cited no matter how the prompt is worded. If you are still weighing the field, our roundup of the best AI visibility tools ranks both approaches side by side.
Is citAEOtion a Profound alternative?
Yes. citAEOtion is a log-based alternative to the prompt-based Profound. Instead of sampling AI answers for mentions, it counts real AI crawler hits in your server traffic, at $34.99 per month versus Profound's around $99 per month billed yearly.
Does Profound show which AI bots crawled my site?
No. Profound is prompt-based and observes AI answers to sample questions. It does not read your server traffic, so it cannot report which crawlers, such as GPTBot or ClaudeBot, fetched your pages. citAEOtion does that by reading real requests.
How much cheaper is citAEOtion than Profound?
citAEOtion is $34.99 per month for a single site. Profound starts at around $99 per month billed yearly and rises to around $399 per month for Growth. citAEOtion is roughly one third of Profound's entry price.
Can I use both citAEOtion and Profound?
Yes. Some teams run citAEOtion for ground-truth crawl data and Profound for answer-level mention share. Crawl data comes first, since an AI system must fetch a page before it can cite it.
Which is better for agencies, citAEOtion or Profound?
citAEOtion offers white-label reports, multi-site and agency plans, and a Founders Club that locks 25 percent off agency pricing for limited seats. Profound reserves broader multi-account features for enterprise and custom plans at higher cost.
See it on your own site
Compare the numbers yourself: start a live demo or view pricing.

---
Site: citAEOtion - https://citaeotion.ai/
LLM index: https://citaeotion.ai/llms.txt | Full text: https://citaeotion.ai/llms-full.txt